| Title |
Soil pH rather than nutrients drive changes in microbial community following long-term fertilization in acidic Ultisols of southern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Soils and Sediments, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11368-018-1934-2 |
| Authors |
Jia Liu, Ming Liu, Meng Wu, Chunyu Jiang, Xiaofen Chen, Zejiang Cai, Boren Wang, Jie Zhang, Taolin Zhang, Zhongpei Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,129,652
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#69
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,645
of 444,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.