↓ Skip to main content

Treatment Initiation for New Episodes of Depression in Primary Care Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 8,233)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
70 news outlets
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Treatment Initiation for New Episodes of Depression in Primary Care Settings
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11606-017-4297-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth Waitzfelder, Christine Stewart, Karen J. Coleman, Rebecca Rossom, Brian K. Ahmedani, Arne Beck, John E. Zeber, Yihe G. Daida, Connie Trinacty, Samuel Hubley, Gregory E. Simon

Abstract

Depression is prevalent and costly, but despite effective treatments, is often untreated. Recent efforts to improve depression care have focused on primary care settings. Disparities in treatment initiation for depression have been reported, with fewer minority and older individuals starting treatment. To describe patient characteristics associated with depression treatment initiation and treatment choice (antidepressant medications or psychotherapy) among patients newly diagnosed with depression in primary care settings. A retrospective observational design was used to analyze electronic health record data. A total of 241,251 adults newly diagnosed with depression in primary care settings among five health care systems from 2010 to 2013. ICD-9 codes for depression, following a 365-day period with no depression diagnosis or treatment, were used to identify new depression episodes. Treatment initiation was defined as a completed psychotherapy visit or a filled prescription for antidepressant medication within 90 days of diagnosis. Depression severity was measured with Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores on the day of diagnosis. Overall, 35.7% of patients with newly diagnosed depression initiated treatment. The odds of treatment initiation among Asians, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics were at least 30% lower than among non-Hispanic whites, controlling for all other variables. The odds of patients aged  ≥ 60 years starting treatment were half those of patients age 44 years and under. Treatment initiation increased with depression severity, but was only 53% among patients with a PHQ-9 score of ≥ 10. Among minority patients, psychotherapy was initiated significantly more often than medication. Screening for depression in primary care is a positive step towards improving detection, treatment, and outcomes for depression. However, study results indicate that treatment initiation remains suboptimal, and disparities persist. A better understanding of patient factors, and particularly system-level factors, that influence treatment initiation is needed to inform efforts by heath care systems to improve depression treatment engagement and to reduce disparities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 35 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 563. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#42,888
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#36
of 8,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,005
of 449,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.