Title |
A non-local gap-penalty for profile alignment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, January 1996
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02458279 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William R. Taylor |
Abstract |
The length of an alignment of biological sequences is typically longer than the mean length of its component sequences. (This arises from the insertion of gaps in the alignment.) When such an alignment is used as a profile for the alignment of further sequences (or profiles), it will have a bias toward additional sequences that match the length of the profile, rather than the mean length of sequences in the profile, as the alignment of these will entail fewer (or smaller) insertions (so avoiding gap-penalties). An algorithm is described to correct this bias that entails monitoring the correspondence, for every pair of positions, of the mean separations in both profiles as they are aligned. The correction was incorporated into a standard dynamic programming algorithm through a modification of the gap-penalty, but, unlike other approaches, this modification is not local and takes into consideration the overall alignment of the sequences. This implies that the algorithm cannot guarantee to find the optimal alignment, but tests suggest that close approximations are obtained. The method was tested on protein families by measuring the area in the parameter space of the phase containing the correct multiple alignment. No improvement (increase in phase area) was found with a family that required few gaps to be aligned correctly. However, for highly gapped alignments, a 50% increase in area was obtained with one family and the correct alignment was found for another that could not be aligned with the unbiased method. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Chemistry | 1 | 20% |
Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |