↓ Skip to main content

Oxytocin enhances the appropriate use of human social cues by the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) in an object choice task

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
38 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Oxytocin enhances the appropriate use of human social cues by the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) in an object choice task
Published in
Animal Cognition, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10071-015-0843-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. L. Oliva, J.-L. Rault, B. Appleton, A. Lill

Abstract

It has been postulated that the neuropeptide, oxytocin, is involved in human-dog bonding. This may explain why dogs, compared to wolves, are such good performers on object choice tasks, which test their ability to attend to, and use, human social cues in order to find hidden food treats. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of intranasal oxytocin administration, which is known to increase social cognition in humans, on domestic dogs' ability to perform such a task. We hypothesised that dogs would perform better on the task after an intranasal treatment of oxytocin. Sixty-two (31 males and 31 females) pet dogs completed the experiment over two different testing sessions, 5-15 days apart. Intranasal oxytocin or a saline control was administered 45 min before each session. All dogs received both treatments in a pseudo-randomised, counterbalanced order. Data were collected as scores out of ten for each of the four blocks of trials in each session. Two blocks of trials were conducted using a momentary distal pointing cue and two using a gazing cue, given by the experimenter. Oxytocin enhanced performance using momentary distal pointing cues, and this enhanced level of performance was maintained over 5-15 days time in the absence of oxytocin. Oxytocin also decreased aversion to gazing cues, in that performance was below chance levels after saline administration but at chance levels after oxytocin administration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 14 10%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 31%
Psychology 23 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#314,321
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#86
of 1,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,768
of 362,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.