| Title |
PIV for granular flows
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003480050023 |
| Authors |
R. M. Lueptow, A. Akonur, T. Shinbrot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 41% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 47 | 54% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#165
of 1,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,719
of 111,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them