You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-incompatibility in the Grasses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, March 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1006/anbo.1999.1056 |
| Authors |
Ute Baumann, Juan Juttner, Xueyu Bian, Peter Langridge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 58 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 71% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,347
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,694
of 41,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.