↓ Skip to main content

Confuciusornis sanctus Compared to Archaeopteryx lithographica

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Confuciusornis sanctus Compared to Archaeopteryx lithographica
Published in
The Science of Nature, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s001140050501
Authors

L. D. Martin, Z. Zhou, L. Hou, A. Feduccia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Brazil 3 4%
Chile 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 69 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 38%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,615,017
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#702
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,086
of 223,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.