↓ Skip to main content

Inter-individual variation of DNA methylation and its implications for large-scale epigenome mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inter-individual variation of DNA methylation and its implications for large-scale epigenome mapping
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, April 2008
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkn122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Bock, Jörn Walter, Martina Paulsen, Thomas Lengauer

Abstract

Genomic DNA methylation profiles exhibit substantial variation within the human population, with important functional implications for gene regulation. So far little is known about the characteristics and determinants of DNA methylation variation among healthy individuals. We performed bioinformatic analysis of high-resolution methylation profiles from multiple individuals, uncovering complex patterns of inter-individual variation that are strongly correlated with the local DNA sequence. CpG-rich regions exhibit low and relatively similar levels of DNA methylation in all individuals, but the sequential order of the (few) methylated among the (many) unmethylated CpGs differs randomly across individuals. In contrast, CpG-poor regions exhibit substantially elevated levels of inter-individual variation, but also significant conservation of specific DNA methylation patterns between unrelated individuals. This observation has important implications for experimental analysis of DNA methylation, e.g. in the context of epigenome projects. First, DNA methylation mapping at single-CpG resolution is expected to uncover informative DNA methylation patterns for the CpG-poor bulk of the human genome. Second, for CpG-rich regions it will be sufficient to measure average methylation levels rather than assaying every single CpG. We substantiate these conclusions by an in silico benchmarking study of six widely used methods for DNA methylation mapping. Based on our findings, we propose a cost-optimized two-track strategy for mammalian methylome projects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Germany 3 2%
France 2 1%
India 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 129 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 41 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Professor 12 8%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Computer Science 7 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 13 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#13,661
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,459
of 95,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#54
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.