| Title |
Central venous-arterial carbon dioxide difference as an indicator of cardiac index
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-005-2602-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Cuschieri, Emanuel P. Rivers, Michael W. Donnino, Marius Katilius, Gordon Jacobsen, H. Bryant Nguyen, Nikolai Pamukov, H. Mathilda Horst |
| Abstract |
The mixed venous-arterial (v-a) pCO(2) difference has been shown to be inversely correlated with the cardiac index (CI). A central venous pCO(2), which is easier to obtain, may provide similar information. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between the central venous-arterial pCO(2) difference and CI. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 20% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 26% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 71% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,837
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,893
of 59,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.