↓ Skip to main content

The Evolution, Distribution and Diversity of Endogenous Retroviruses

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
308 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The Evolution, Distribution and Diversity of Endogenous Retroviruses
Published in
Virus Genes, May 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024455415443
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Gifford, Michael Tristem

Abstract

The retroviral capacity for integration into the host genome can give rise to endogenous retroviruses (ERVs): retroviral sequences that are transmitted vertically as part of the host germ line, within which they may continue to replicate and evolve. ERVs represent both a unique archive of ancient viral sequence information and a dynamic component of host genomes. As such they hold great potential as informative markers for studies of both virus evolution and host genome evolution. Numerous novel ERVs have been described in recent years, particularly as genome sequencing projects have advanced. This review discusses the evolution of ERV lineages, considering the processes by which ERV distribution and diversity is generated. The diversity of ERVs isolated so far is summarised in terms of both their distribution across host taxa, and their relationships to recognised retroviral genera. Finally the relevance of ERVs to studies of genome evolution, host disease and viral ecology is considered, and recent findings discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 280 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 25%
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 52 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#155
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,873
of 54,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them