↓ Skip to main content

Immunocytochemical detection of breast cancer cells in marrow and peripheral blood of patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Immunocytochemical detection of breast cancer cells in marrow and peripheral blood of patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01807031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilbur A. Franklin, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Philip Archer, Charles S. Johnston, Sara Garza-Williams, Lisa Hami, Mitchell A. Bitter, Robert C. Bast, Roy B. Jones

Abstract

Detection of small numbers of breast cancer cells is important in staging the disease and can be helpful in assessing the efficacy of purging regimens prior to autologous stem cell infusion. Immunohistochemical methods are potentially useful and broadly applicable for this purpose since they are simple to perform, sensitive, and may be quite specific. We have used a combination of four monoclonal antibodies [260F9, 520C9, 317G5 (Baxter Corp); BrE-3 (Dr. R. Ceriani)] against tumor cell surface glycoproteins in a sensitive immunocytochemical assay to identify breast tumor cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Immunostained cytospin preparations were fixed prior to staining to preserve cytological details of immunopositive cells. After immunostaining, slides were counterstained with hematoxylin to confirm the identify of labeled cells. In cytocentrifuge experiments in which small numbers of CAMA human breast tumor cells were added to bone marrow mononuclear cells, a linear relationship between the number of tumor cells added and the number of tumor cells detected was obtained over a broad range of tumor cell concentrations. The probability of detecting tumor cells was dependent on the number of cytocentrifuge slides examined. When ten slides (5 million cells) were examined, the probability of detecting tumor at a concentration of 4 tumor cells per million bone marrow mononuclear cells was 98%. In clinical specimens, tumor cells were detected in marrow aspirates from 73 of 240 (30%) patients undergoing autologous transplantation, including 70 (37%) of 190 patients with clinical stage IV disease, 0 of 7 patients with clinical stage III disease, and 3 of 43 (7%) patients with clinical stage II disease. Seventy-three of 657 peripheral blood specimens from 26 of 155 patients (17%) contained breast cancer cells with counts ranging from 1 to 97 tumor cells per million leukocytes. Tumor cells were most frequently found in the blood of patients with stage IV disease [21 of 107 (20%)] but were also found in a substantial number [5 of 44 (11%)] of patients with stage II disease. Positive selection of CD34-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells as well as negative purging methods such as incubation with 4-hydroxyperoxy-cyclophosphamide (4-HC) were evaluated with respect to tumor cell depletion. Selection of CD34-positive progenitor cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood resulted in log reduction of 1 to > 4 tumor cells reinfused at autologous transplantation. A lesser log reduction (up to 1) was demonstrated following 4-HC purging. We conclude that properly performed and controlled immunocytochemical staining of bone marrow and peripheral blood cytospins is a sensitive and simple way to detect and quantitate breast cancer cells in hematopoietic specimens harvested for autotransplantation and that CD34-positive progenitor cell selection results in significant reduction in the number of breast cancer cells reinfused with marrow or peripheral blood stem cells.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,995,312
of 24,052,577 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,763
of 4,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,789
of 82,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,052,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.