↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, laboratory, psychiatric and magnetic resonance findings in patients with Sydenham chorea

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Clinical, laboratory, psychiatric and magnetic resonance findings in patients with Sydenham chorea
Published in
Neuroradiology, June 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00234-003-0999-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrícia C. Faustino, Maria Teresa R. A. Terreri, Antônio J. da Rocha, Marcelo C. Zappitelli, Henrique M. Lederman, Maria Odete E. Hilário

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Other 16 28%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 50%
Psychology 5 9%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#303
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,758
of 48,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them