↓ Skip to main content

4-repeat tauopathy sharing pathological and biochemical features of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
4-repeat tauopathy sharing pathological and biochemical features of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, June 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00401-003-0728-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omi Katsuse, Eizo Iseki, Tetsuaki Arai, Haruhiko Akiyama, Takashi Togo, Hirotake Uchikado, Masanori Kato, Rohan de Silva, Andrew Lees, Kenji Kosaka

Abstract

We report a 67-year-old man with 4-repeat (4R) tauopathy sharing both features of corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Although CBD and PSP have a common pathological feature that 4R tau accumulates in neurons and glia, recent pathological studies have confirmed differences between the two disorders. Clinical features of the present case were asymmetrical apraxia, parkinsonism, memory disturbance, disorientation and left limb myoclonus with a 5-year history. Pathological features were the widespread occurrence of 4R tau-positive structures including pre-tangles, neurofibrillary tangles, astrocytic plaques, tufted astrocytes, coiled bodies and argyrophilic threads. Biochemically, immunoblotting of insoluble tau demonstrated the low molecular fragments of 37 kDa and 33 kDa observed in typical CBD and PSP, respectively, in addition to the presence of 4R tau isoforms. The present case shared tau-related pathological and biochemical features of CBD and PSP. These findings support that CBD and PSP are closely associated disorders having a pathogenesis common to 4R tauopathy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,365
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,810
of 50,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them