↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of cardiac preload and left ventricular function under increasing levels of positive end-expiratory pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of cardiac preload and left ventricular function under increasing levels of positive end-expiratory pressure
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00134-003-1993-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Luecke, Harry Roth, Peter Herrmann, Alf Joachim, Gerald Weisser, Paolo Pelosi, Michael Quintel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 16%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 24 32%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 72%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,837
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,439
of 133,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.