↓ Skip to main content

ADP-ribosylation factors: a family of ∼20-kDa guanine nucleotide-binding proteins that activate cholera toxin

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
ADP-ribosylation factors: a family of ∼20-kDa guanine nucleotide-binding proteins that activate cholera toxin
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00928458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine F. Welsh, Joel Moss, Martha Vaughan

Abstract

ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) comprise a family of approximately 20 kDa guanine nucleotide-binding proteins that were discovered as one of several cofactors required in cholera toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of Gs alpha, the guanine nucleotide-binding protein responsible for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, and was subsequently found to enhance all cholera toxin-catalyzed reactions and to directly interact with, and activate the toxin. ARF is dependent on GTP or its analogues for activity, binds GTP with high affinity in the presence of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine/cholate and contains consensus sequences for GTP-binding and hydrolysis. Six mammalian family members have been identified which have been classified into three groups (Class I, II, and III) based on size, deduced amino acid sequence identity, phylogenetic analysis and gene structure. ARFs are ubiquitous among eukaryotes, with a deduced amino acid sequence that is highly conserved across diverse species. They have recently been shown to associate with phospholipid and Golgi membranes in a GTP-dependent manner and are involved in regulating vesicular transport.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 27%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#481
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,002
of 76,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.