↓ Skip to main content

Mixing characterization of highly underexpanded fluid jets with real gas expansion

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Mixing characterization of highly underexpanded fluid jets with real gas expansion
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00348-018-2488-1
Authors

Felix J. Förster, Steffen Baab, Christoph Steinhausen, Grazia Lamanna, Paul Ewart, Bernhard Weigand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 17 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 29%
Unknown 20 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,490,822
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#529
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,530
of 442,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.