| Title |
Evolution of the madro-tertiary geoflora
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, July 1958
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02872570 |
| Authors |
Daniel I. Axelrod |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,482,315
of 25,310,061 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#80
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,310,061 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them