| Title |
Systematic review of quality of life in Turner syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-018-1810-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Trombeta Reis, Maíra Seabra de Assumpção, Gil Guerra-Junior, Sofia Helena Valente de Lemos-Marini |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to systematically review the available literature on "quality of life" (QoL) or "health-related quality of life" (HRQoL) in Turner syndrome (TS) patients and to analyze the relations among height, puberty, and the use of growth hormone (GH) and the QoL of TS patients. An electronic bibliographic search was conducted through the PubMed, Embase, Bireme, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The main terms were "Quality of Life" and "Turner syndrome." Among the databases, 559 articles were found; after the selection process, 13 studies were selected. A quality assessment was conducted, and all the studies were of high quality. Eight well-known QoL questionnaires were used, and the selected studies presented factors that may be related to the QoL of TS patients, such as height, puberty, and GH use. However, a more detailed understanding of which factors are associated with the QoL of TS patients is still needed, which may be due to the lack of specific QoL instruments involving important aspects related to TS. The QoL of TS patients appears to be compromised, but existing data regarding the relations among height, puberty, and GH and QoL are still controversial. Although these factors should be carefully considered in TS patients, it was not possible to determine whether they have a significant relation with the QoL of TS patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,587,406
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#2,073
of 2,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,978
of 442,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#54
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,916 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.