You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
GUIDELINES FOR THE FIELD EVALUATION OF DESERT TORTOISE HEALTH AND DISEASE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.7589/0090-3558-37.3.427 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin H. Berry, Mary M. Christopher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#263
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,930
of 40,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them