↓ Skip to main content

Natural polysaccharides as electroactive polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Natural polysaccharides as electroactive polymers
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00253-005-1931-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria L. Finkenstadt

Abstract

Electroactive polymers (EAPs), a new class of materials, have the potential to be used for applications like biosensors, environmentally sensitive membranes, artificial muscles, actuators, corrosion protection, electronic shielding, visual displays, solar materials, and components in high-energy batteries. The commercialization of synthetic EAPs, however, has so far been severely limited. Biological polymers offer a degree of functionality not available in most synthetic EAPs. Carbohydrate polymers are produced with great frequency in nature. Starch, cellulose, and chitin are some of the most abundant natural polymers on earth. Biopolymers are a renewable resource and have a wide range of uses in nature, functioning as energy storage, transport, signaling, and structural components. In general, electroactive materials with polysaccharide matrices reach conductance levels comparable with synthetic ion-conducting EAPs. This review gives a brief history of EAPs, including terminology, describes evaluation methods, and reports on the current progress of incorporating polysaccharides as matrices for doped, blended, and grafted electroactive materials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mongolia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 214 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 60 27%
Engineering 31 14%
Materials Science 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 60 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,748
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,491
of 60,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#31
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.