↓ Skip to main content

Infusion reactions associated with rituximab treatment for childhood-onset complicated nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Infusion reactions associated with rituximab treatment for childhood-onset complicated nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00467-018-3900-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koichi Kamei, Masao Ogura, Mai Sato, Shuichi Ito, Kenji Ishikura

Abstract

Infusion reaction (IR) is defined as an adverse event within 24 h after monoclonal antibody infusion. In non-Hodgkin lymphoma, IR incidence following rituximab treatment is high (77-80%), but there are no data in complicated nephrotic syndrome. Records of rituximab infusions in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome between February 2006 and December 2014 at the National Center for Child Health and Development were reviewed. Rituximab was administered at doses of 375 mg/m2. The severity of IR was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 4.0. For 309 rituximab infusions in 159 patients (male, 110; median age, 12 years), IR was observed in 165 infusions (53.4%). Respiratory symptoms were most common (66% of all events). Ninety-five percent of the IR was observed within 3 h after rituximab infusion initiation. Sixty-eight percent of the events were classified as grade 1 and others classified as grade 2. Only 18% required medical intervention. CD20 cell count in patients with IR was significantly higher than in patients without IR. Incidence of IR was similar in subsequent rituximab treatment after B-cell recovery. Patients who experienced IR at first rituximab treatment were more likely to experience recurrent IR with subsequent treatments compared to those not having IR at initial treatment (odds ratio 3.64; p < 0.001). In patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome, respiratory symptoms were the major type of IR, mostly observed within 3 h of infusion. Incidence of IR was lower and its severity milder in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome than those with lymphoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Engineering 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,852,118
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#810
of 4,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,759
of 453,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#10
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.