↓ Skip to main content

On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
363 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids
Published in
The Science of Nature, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00114-005-0636-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian P. Schiestl

Abstract

A standing enigma in pollination ecology is the evolution of pollinator attraction without offering reward in about one third of all orchid species. Here I review concepts of pollination by deception, and in particular recent findings in the pollination syndromes of food deception and sexual deception in orchids. Deceptive orchids mimic floral signals of rewarding plants (food deception) or mating signals of receptive females (sexual deception) to attract pollen vectors. In some food deceptive orchids, similarities in the spectral reflectance visible to the pollinator in a model plant and its mimic, and increased reproductive success of the mimic in the presence of the model have been demonstrated. Other species do not mimic specific model plants but attract pollinators with general attractive floral signals. In sexually deceptive orchids, floral odor is the key trait for pollinator attraction, and behaviorally active compounds in the orchids are identical to the sex pheromone of the pollinator species. Deceptive orchids often show high variability in floral signals, which may be maintained by negative frequency-dependent selection, since pollinators can learn and subsequently avoid common deceptive morphs more quickly than rare ones. The evolution of obligate deception in orchids seems paradoxical in the light of the typically lower fruit set than in rewarding species. Pollination by deception, however, can reduce self-pollination and encourage pollen flow over longer distances, thus promoting outbreeding. Although some food deceptive orchids are isolated through postzygotic reproductive barriers, sexually deceptive orchids lack post-mating barriers and species isolation is achieved via specific pollinator attraction. Recent population genetic and phylogenetic investigations suggest gene-flow within subgeneric clades, but pollinator-mediated selection may maintain species-specific floral traits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Brazil 7 2%
Germany 5 1%
Colombia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 323 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 18%
Researcher 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Student > Master 47 13%
Professor 22 6%
Other 68 19%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 228 62%
Environmental Science 36 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Psychology 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 65 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,042,756
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#383
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,608
of 58,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.