↓ Skip to main content

High dispersal in a frog species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High dispersal in a frog species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation
Published in
Biology Letters, March 2005
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0270
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Chris Funk, Allison E Greene, Paul Stephen Corn, Fred W Allendorf

Abstract

Global losses of amphibian populations are a major conservation concern and their causes have generated substantial debate. Habitat fragmentation is considered one important cause of amphibian decline. However, if fragmentation is to be invoked as a mechanism of amphibian decline, it must first be established that dispersal is prevalent among contiguous amphibian populations using formal movement estimators. In contrast, if dispersal is naturally low in amphibians, fragmentation can be disregarded as a cause of amphibian declines and conservation efforts can be focused elsewhere. We examined dispersal rates in Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) using capture-recapture analysis of over 10,000 frogs in combination with genetic analysis of microsatellite loci in replicate basins. We found that frogs had exceptionally high juvenile dispersal rates (up to 62% annually) over long distances (>5km), large elevation gains (>750m) and steep inclines (36 degrees incline over 2km) that were corroborated by genetic data showing high gene flow. These findings show that dispersal is an important life-history feature of some amphibians and suggest that habitat fragmentation is a serious threat to amphibian persistence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 9 2%
United States 7 2%
South Africa 4 1%
India 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 343 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 19%
Student > Master 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 7%
Other 82 22%
Unknown 36 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 249 66%
Environmental Science 68 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 40 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,753,480
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#2,506
of 3,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,125
of 60,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.