↓ Skip to main content

Performance on two cognitive tasks by dysphoric and nondysphoric students

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, June 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Performance on two cognitive tasks by dysphoric and nondysphoric students
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, June 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf01173473
Authors

Dana O. Dennard, Jack E. Hokanson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 42%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,660,617
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#406
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,067
of 11,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.