↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of Long-Range Persistence in Geophysical Time Series: Conventional and Benchmark-Based Improvement Techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Surveys in Geophysics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Quantification of Long-Range Persistence in Geophysical Time Series: Conventional and Benchmark-Based Improvement Techniques
Published in
Surveys in Geophysics, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10712-012-9217-8
Authors

Annette Witt, Bruce D. Malamud

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Professor 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 20%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Engineering 9 11%
Physics and Astronomy 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#114
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,845
of 198,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.