↓ Skip to main content

Autoantibodies against HSF1 and CCDC155 as Biomarkers of Early-Stage, High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autoantibodies against HSF1 and CCDC155 as Biomarkers of Early-Stage, High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2018
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy L. Wilson, Laura R. Moffitt, Nadine Duffield, Adam Rainczuk, Tom W. Jobling, Magdalena Plebanski, Andrew N. Stephens

Abstract

Tumor-directed circulating autoantibodies (AAbs) are a well-established feature of many solid tumor types, and are often observed prior to clinical disease manifestation. As such, they may provide a good indicator of early disease development. We have conducted a pilot study to identify novel AAbs as markers of early stage HGSOCs. A rare cohort of patients with early (FIGO stage Ia-c) HGSOCs for IgG, IgA and IgM-mediated AAb reactivity using high content protein arrays (containing 9184 individual proteins). AAb reactivity against selected antigens was validated by ELISA in a second, independent cohort of individual patients. A total of 184 antigens were differentially detected in early-stage HGSOC patients compared to all other patient groups assessed. Amongst the six most highly detected "early stage" antigens, anti-IgA AAbs against HSF1 and anti-IgG AAbs CCDC155 (KASH5; nesprin 5) were significantly elevated in patients with early-stage malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis suggested that AAbs against HSF1 provided better detection of early-stage malignancy than CA125 alone. Combined measurement of anti-HSF1, anti-CCDC155 and CA125 also improved efficacy at higher sensitivity. The combined measurement of anti-HSF1, anti-CCDC155 and CA125 may be useful for early stage HGSOC detection. This is the first study to specifically identify AAbs associated with early-stage HGSOC. The presence and high frequency of specific AAbs in early stage cancer patients warrants a larger scale examination to define their value for early disease detection at primary diagnosis and/or recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,711,488
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,054
of 4,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,256
of 446,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#12
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.