↓ Skip to main content

BRE/BRCC45 regulates CDC25A stability by recruiting USP7 in response to DNA damage

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BRE/BRCC45 regulates CDC25A stability by recruiting USP7 in response to DNA damage
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03020-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kajal Biswas, Subha Philip, Aditya Yadav, Betty K. Martin, Sandra Burkett, Vaibhav Singh, Anav Babbar, Susan Lynn North, Suhwan Chang, Shyam K. Sharan

Abstract

BRCA2 is essential for maintaining genomic integrity. BRCA2-deficient primary cells are either not viable or exhibit severe proliferation defects. Yet, BRCA2 deficiency contributes to tumorigenesis. It is believed that mutations in genes such as TRP53 allow BRCA2 heterozygous cells to overcome growth arrest when they undergo loss of heterozygosity. Here, we report the use of an insertional mutagenesis screen to identify a role for BRE (Brain and Reproductive organ Expressed, also known as BRCC45), known to be a part of the BRCA1-DNA damage sensing complex, in the survival of BRCA2-deficient mouse ES cells. Cell viability by BRE overexpression is mediated by deregulation of CDC25A phosphatase, a key cell cycle regulator and an oncogene. We show that BRE facilitates deubiquitylation of CDC25A by recruiting ubiquitin-specific-processing protease 7 (USP7) in the presence of DNA damage. Additionally, we uncovered the role of CDC25A in BRCA-mediated tumorigenesis, which can have implications in cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#42,379
of 47,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,484
of 437,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,033
of 1,148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.