↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lifestyle factors and risk of sporadic colorectal cancer by microsatellite instability status: a systematic review and meta-analyses
Published in
Annals of Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdy059
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The association of lifestyle factors with molecular pathological subtypes of colorectal cancer (CRC), such as microsatellite instability (MSI), could provide further knowledge about the colorectal carcinogenic process. The aim of this review was to evaluate possible associations between lifestyle factors and risk of sporadic CRC by MSI status. PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating the association between alcohol, body mass index (BMI), dietary fiber, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical activity, red meat, smoking, or statin use, with MSI-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. Meta-analyses were performed to calculate summary relative risks (sRR). Overall, 31 studies reporting on the association between lifestyle factors and CRC according to MSI status were included in this review. Ever smoking was associated with MSI-H (sRR=1.62; 95%CI: 1.40-1.88) and MSS/MSI-Low CRC (sRR=1.10; 95%CI: 1.01-1.20), but the association was significantly stronger for MSI-H CRC. The use of HRT was associated with a 20% decrease (sRR=0.80; 95%CI: 0.73-0.89) in the risk of MSS CRC, but was not associated with MSI-H CRC. An increase in BMI per 5 kg/m2 was equally associated with MSS and MSI-H CRC (sRR=1.22, in both cases), but was statistically significant for MSS CRC only (95%CI: 1.11-1.34 and 0.94-1.58, respectively). Limited evidence for associations between other lifestyle factors and CRC by MSI status exists. Lifestyle factors, such as HRT and smoking are differentially associated with the risk of MSI-H and MSS CRC. Further research on associations of lifestyle factors and CRC subtypes is necessary to provide a better understanding of the CRC disease pathway.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 65 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 66 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,142,991
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#2,902
of 7,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,875
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#58
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.