↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral fitting of BAHAs and BAHA® fitted in unilateral deaf persons: Acoustical aspects Adaptación bilateral de BAHA y adaptación de BAHA en sorderas unilaterales: Aspectos acústicos

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Audiology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bilateral fitting of BAHAs and BAHA® fitted in unilateral deaf persons: Acoustical aspects Adaptación bilateral de BAHA y adaptación de BAHA en sorderas unilaterales: Aspectos acústicos
Published in
International Journal of Audiology, July 2009
DOI 10.1080/14992020500031561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Stenfelt

Abstract

The benefit of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) to a patient fitted bilaterally; and the benefit of a BAHA to a unilaterally deaf person was estimated by four acoustical measurements: directional sensitivity of a BAHA placed at the skull, vibration transmission in the skull, gain, and estimated transcranial attenuation of bone conducted sound. Provided a patient has a similar bone conduction hearing ability at both cochlea, it was found that a patient should, theoretically, benefit from bilateral fitting of BAHAs in terms of better hearing thresholds from the front, and better overall hearing ability from the surround. The data indicates further, that bilateral fitting facilitates extraction of interaural cues, which should lead to greater ability to determine the direction of a sound source, as well as better hearing in noise. However, due to the cross-hearing of bone conducted sound, the binaural processing for the patient fitted bilaterally with BAHAs is less than for normal binaural air conduction hearing. Finally, the data showed that the benefit of fitting a BAHA in a unilaterally deaf person, depends on that person's transcranial attenuation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 8 17%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Engineering 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Audiology
#467
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,065
of 109,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Audiology
#36
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.