| Title |
2017 PRETEXT: radiologic staging system for primary hepatic malignancies of childhood revised for the Paediatric Hepatic International Tumour Trial (PHITT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-018-4078-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander J. Towbin, Rebecka L. Meyers, Helen Woodley, Osamu Miyazaki, Christopher B. Weldon, Bruce Morland, Eiso Hiyama, Piotr Czauderna, Derek J. Roebuck, Greg M. Tiao |
| Abstract |
Imaging is crucial in the assessment of children with a primary hepatic malignancy. Since its inception in 1992, the PRETEXT (PRE-Treatment EXTent of tumor) system has become the primary method of risk stratification for hepatoblastoma and pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma in numerous cooperative group trials across the world. The PRETEXT system is made of two components: the PRETEXT group and the annotation factors. The PRETEXT group describes the extent of tumor within the liver while the annotation factors help to describe associated features such as vascular involvement (either portal vein or hepatic vein/inferior vena cava), extrahepatic disease, multifocality, tumor rupture and metastatic disease (to both the lungs and lymph nodes). This manuscript is written by members of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) in North America, the International Childhood Liver Tumors Strategy Group (SIOPEL) in Europe, and the Japanese Study Group for Pediatric Liver Tumor (JPLT; now part of the Japan Children's Cancer Group) and represents an international consensus update to the 2005 PRETEXT definitions. These definitions will be used in the forthcoming Trial to Pediatric Hepatic International Tumor Trial (PHITT). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Algeria | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 38% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 22% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,902,486
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#44
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,083
of 455,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.