↓ Skip to main content

Individual biological sensitivity to environmental influences: testing the differential susceptibility properties of the 5HTTLPR polymorphism in relation to depressive symptoms and delinquency in two…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Individual biological sensitivity to environmental influences: testing the differential susceptibility properties of the 5HTTLPR polymorphism in relation to depressive symptoms and delinquency in two adolescent general samples
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00702-018-1854-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecilia Åslund, Kent W. Nilsson

Abstract

The gene-environment interaction research field in psychiatry has traditionally been dominated by the diathesis-stress framework, where certain genotypes are assumed to confer increased risk for adverse outcomes in a stressful environment. In later years, theories of differential susceptibility, or biological sensitivity, suggest that candidate genes that interact with environmental events do not exclusively confer a risk for behavioural or psychiatric disorders but rather seem to alter the sensitivity to both positive and negative environmental influences. The present study investigates the susceptibility properties of the serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region (5HTTLPR) in relation to depressive symptoms and delinquency in two separate adolescent community samples: n = 1457, collected in 2006; and n = 191, collected in 2001. Two-, three-, and four-way interactions between the 5HTTLPR, positive and negative family environment, and sex were found in relation to both depressive symptoms and delinquency. However, the susceptibility properties of the 5HTTLPR were distinctly less pronounced in relation to depressive symptoms. If the assumption that the 5HTTLPR induces differential susceptibility to both positive and negative environmental influences is correct, the previous failures to measure and control for positive environmental factors might be a possible explanation for former inconsistent findings within the research field.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 35 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 36 39%