↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Early Versus Late Referral for Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Structural Heart Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
45 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Early Versus Late Referral for Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Structural Heart Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.12.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Romero, Luigi Di Biase, Juan Carlos Diaz, Renato Quispe, Xianfeng Du, David Briceno, Ricardo Avendano, Usha Tedrow, Roy M John, Gregory F Michaud, Andrea Natale, William G Stevenson, Saurabh Kumar

Abstract

This was a meta-analysis of published studies to examine the impact of early referral on outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease. Patients are frequently referred for VT ablation after failure of antiarrhythmic drugs to control VT. Some studies have suggested that early referral might confer better outcomes. An electronic search was performed using major databases. The primary outcomes were long-term VT recurrence and total mortality. Secondary outcomes were acute procedural success and acute complications. Three studies were included with a total of 980 patients (mean age 64 ± 12 years, 71% males). Mean follow-up was 29 ± 27 months. Early referral for VT ablation was associated with decreased VT recurrence and acute complications compared with late referral (relative risk: 0.69 [95% confidence interval: 0.58 to 0.82], p < 0.0001 and relative risk: 0.50 [95% confidence interval: 0.27 to 0.93], p = 0.03, respectively). There was no significant difference between early and late referral for total mortality and acute success. Late referral for VT ablation was associated with worse outcomes (VT recurrence and acute complications) in patients with structural heart disease, which suggests that early referral for VT ablation might be a reasonable consideration in this patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Librarian 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,271,497
of 25,500,206 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#252
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,852
of 455,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,500,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.