↓ Skip to main content

Potential Role of Pharmacogenomics in Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
584 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential Role of Pharmacogenomics in Reducing Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2001
DOI 10.1001/jama.286.18.2270
Pubmed ID
Authors

K A Phillips, D L Veenstra, E Oren, J K Lee, W Sadee

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although many adverse drug reactions are considered nonpreventable, recent developments suggest these reactions may be avoided through individualization of drug therapies based on genetic information, an application known as pharmacogenomics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 239 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 59 24%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 10%
Chemistry 10 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 45 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,872,042
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#12,063
of 36,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,861
of 56,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#28
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.