↓ Skip to main content

Appropriateness of DSS and TSP as internal references for 1H NMR studies of molten globule proteins in aqueous media

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, November 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Appropriateness of DSS and TSP as internal references for 1H NMR studies of molten globule proteins in aqueous media
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, November 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00398414
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Shimizu, M. Ikeguchi, S. Sugai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 8%
Spain 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 45 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#132
of 615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,653
of 23,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 615 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.