↓ Skip to main content

Virology Division News: The new plant virus family Flexiviridae and assessment of molecular criteria for species demarcation

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
382 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Virology Division News: The new plant virus family Flexiviridae and assessment of molecular criteria for species demarcation
Published in
Archives of Virology, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00705-004-0304-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. J. Adams, J. F. Antoniw, M. Bar-Joseph, A. A. Brunt, T. Candresse, G. D. Foster, G. P. Martelli, R. G. Milne, C. M. Fauquet

Abstract

The new plant virus family Flexiviridae is described. The family is named because its members have flexuous virions and it includes the existing genera Allexivirus, Capillovirus, Carlavirus, Foveavirus, Potexvirus, Trichovirus and Vitivirus, plus the new genus Mandarivirus together with some related viruses not assigned to any genus. The family is justified from phylogenetic analyses of the polymerase and coat protein (CP) sequences. To help to define suitable molecular criteria for demarcation of species, a complete set of pairwise comparisons was made using the nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) sequences of each fully-sequenced gene from every available accession in the family. Based on the distributions and on inspection of the data, it was concluded that, as a general rule, distinct species have less than ca. 72% identical nt or 80% identical aa between their entire CP or replication protein genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
India 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 81 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 34%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 30 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 97%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 24%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,231,311
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#859
of 4,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,381
of 58,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.