↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary dynamics of the human ABO gene

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evolutionary dynamics of the human ABO gene
Published in
Human Genetics, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00439-008-0530-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesc Calafell, Francis Roubinet, Anna Ramírez-Soriano, Naruya Saitou, Jaume Bertranpetit, Antoine Blancher

Abstract

The ABO polymorphism has long been suspected to be under balancing selection. To explore this possibility, we analyzed two datasets: (1) a set of 94 23-Kb sequences in European- and African-Americans produced by the Seattle SNPs project, and (2) a set of 814 2-Kb sequences in O alleles from seven worldwide populations. A phylogenetic analysis of the Seattle sequences showed a complex pattern in which the action of recombination and gene conversion are evident, and in which four main lineages could be individuated. The sequence patterns could be linked to the expected blood group phenotype; in particular, the main mutation giving rise to the null O allele is likely to have appeared at least three times in human evolution, giving rise to allele lineages O02, O01, and O09. However, the genealogy changes along the gene and variations of both numbers of branches and of their time depth were observed, which could result from a combined action of recombination and selection. Several neutrality tests clearly demonstrated deviations compatible with balancing selection, peaking at several locations along the gene. The time depth of the genealogy was also incompatible with neutral evolution, particularly in the region from exons 6 to 7, which codes for most of the catalytic domain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Professor 9 9%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,937,918
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#156
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,909
of 82,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them