| Title |
Guaianolides in apiaceae: perspectives on pharmacology and biosynthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-009-9130-z |
| Authors |
Damian Paul Drew, Nadja Krichau, Kirsten Reichwald, Henrik Toft Simonsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 26% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,675,515
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#67
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,648
of 96,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them