↓ Skip to main content

Optimal sequence alignment using affine gap costs

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Optimal sequence alignment using affine gap costs
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02462326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen F. Altschul, Bruce W. Erickson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 105 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 15 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 35%
Computer Science 38 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Engineering 4 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 9 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,529,492
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#368
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,071
of 10,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them