| Title |
Health Effects of Non-Centrifugal Sugar (NCS): A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sugar Tech, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12355-012-0145-1 |
| Authors |
Walter R. Jaffé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,638,790
of 25,369,304 outputs
Outputs from Sugar Tech
#3
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,767
of 168,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sugar Tech
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,369,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.