↓ Skip to main content

Worst-case analysis for region and partial region searches in multidimensional binary search trees and balanced quad trees

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Informatica, March 1977
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 164)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Worst-case analysis for region and partial region searches in multidimensional binary search trees and balanced quad trees
Published in
Acta Informatica, March 1977
DOI 10.1007/bf00263763
Authors

D. T. Lee, C. K. Wong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 61 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 34%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 37 52%
Engineering 10 14%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Mathematics 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Informatica
#30
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,190
of 4,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Informatica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them