↓ Skip to main content

The effect of Appalachian mountaintop mining on interior forest

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of Appalachian mountaintop mining on interior forest
Published in
Landscape Ecology, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9040-z
Authors

J. D. Wickham, K. H. Riitters, T. G. Wade, M. Coan, C. Homer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 24%
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 11 9%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 9%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,409,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#725
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,356
of 66,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.