↓ Skip to main content

Transmission dynamics of the Echinococcus granulosus sheep–dog strain (G1 genotype) in camels in Tunisia

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Parasitology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transmission dynamics of the Echinococcus granulosus sheep–dog strain (G1 genotype) in camels in Tunisia
Published in
Veterinary Parasitology, May 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.02.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Lahmar, H. Debbek, L.H. Zhang, D.P. McManus, A. Souissi, S. Chelly, P.R. Torgerson

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis, caused by Echinococcus granulosus, is highly endemic in North Africa and the Middle East. This paper examines the abundance and prevalence of infection of E. granulosus in camels in Tunisia. No cysts were found in 103 camels from Kébili, whilst 19 of 188 camels from Benguerden (10.1%) were infected. Of the cysts found 95% were considered fertile with the presence of protoscolices and 80% of protoscolices were considered viable by their ability to exclude aqueous eosin. Molecular techniques were used on cyst material from camels and this demonstrated that the study animals were infected with the G1 sheep strain of E. granulosus. Observed data were fitted to a mathematical model by maximum likelihood techniques to define the parameters and their confidence limits and the negative binomial distribution was used to define the error variance in the observed data. The infection pressure to camels was somewhat lower in comparison to sheep reported in an earlier study. However, because camels are much longer-lived animals, the results of the model fit suggested that older camels have a relatively high prevalence rate, reaching a most likely value of 32% at age 15 years. This could represent an important source of transmission to dogs and hence indirectly to man of this zonotic strain. In common with similar studies on other species, there was no evidence of parasite-induced immunity in camels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Parasitology
#727
of 3,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Parasitology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.