You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pathogenic Mechanism of the FIG4 Mutation Responsible for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease CMT4J
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Genetics, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002104 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guy M. Lenk, Cole J. Ferguson, Clement Y. Chow, Natsuko Jin, Julie M. Jones, Adrienne E. Grant, Sergey N. Zolov, Jesse J. Winters, Roman J. Giger, James J. Dowling, Lois S. Weisman, Miriam H. Meisler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 29% |
Researcher | 18 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 23% |
Neuroscience | 16 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#3,136
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,929
of 122,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#21
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.