| Title |
A neural model for category learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, August 1982
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00387211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas L. Reilly, Leon N. Cooper, Charles Elbaum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 27% |
| Researcher | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 30 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,255,836
of 24,733,536 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#106
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#821
of 7,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,733,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them