| Title |
Assessing typhoon damages to Taiwan in the recent decade: return period analysis and loss prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-017-3159-x |
| Authors |
Chia-Jeng Chen, Tsung-Yu Lee, Che-Min Chang, Jun-Yi Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 50% |
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 12% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,445,959
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#224
of 1,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,636
of 442,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.