↓ Skip to main content

The Rayleigh-Taylor instability in the spherical pinch

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fusion Energy, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 134)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The Rayleigh-Taylor instability in the spherical pinch
Published in
Journal of Fusion Energy, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02215847
Authors

H. B. Chen, B. Hilko, E. Panarella

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 18%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Engineering 2 18%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fusion Energy
#34
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,935
of 75,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fusion Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them