| Title |
Volcán Quizapu, Chilean Andes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00278002 |
| Authors |
Wes Hildreth, Robert E Drake |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 77 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,540,398
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#386
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,594
of 61,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.