↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the inhalation toxicity of kretek (clove cigarette) smoke with that of American cigarette smoke. II. Fourteen days, exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, October 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the inhalation toxicity of kretek (clove cigarette) smoke with that of American cigarette smoke. II. Fourteen days, exposure
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, October 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01971829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald C. Clark

Abstract

The comparative repeat dose toxicity of American cigarettes and kreteks (Indonesian cigarettes containing approximately 60% tobacco and 40% shredded clove buds) was assessed by exposure of groups of five male and five female rats to equivalent (approximately 2 mg/l in terms of total particulate matter) concentrations of smoke from each type of cigarette over 15 consecutive days. The smoke was delivered "nose only" using an HRC Rodent Smoking Machine (Mark IV). For each type of cigarette, three doses were used. These were achieved by regulating the daily total duration of exposure to smoke. The different doses used were 2 x, 4 x and 6 x, 15-min exposures, presented daily over a period of approximately 6 h. Inter-group comparisons were made between American and kretek groups which received the same daily durations of smoke exposure. Higher doses of smoke resulted in reduced bodyweight gains and food consumption in male groups; the response of female groups was not as clear. At the highest dose, male rats exposed to kretek smoke gained significantly more weight by comparison with males exposed to American smoke. Higher doses of smoke tended to increase water consumption in both sexes of groups exposed to American smoke; kretek smoke produced no obvious effect. Smoke exposures produced the expected responses in certain haematological and blood biochemical parameters attributed to exposure to CO and the irritants present in cigarette smoke. Such responses were, however, confined largely to the groups exposed to American smoke. Macroscopic pathological findings attributed to smoke inhalation were confined to the lungs, and consisted of minimal to moderate discolouration and incomplete collapse of the lung.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 31%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#958
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,515
of 15,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.