| Title |
A surface-modified sperm sorting device with long-term stability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-006-7705-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason M. Wu, Yaokuang Chung, Kimberly J. Belford, Gary D. Smith, Shuichi Takayama, Joerg Lahann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,546,261
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#236
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,795
of 65,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.