↓ Skip to main content

Discounting the Difficult: How High Math-Identified Women Respond to Stereotype Threat

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Discounting the Difficult: How High Math-Identified Women Respond to Stereotype Threat
Published in
Sex Roles, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2
Authors

Alexandra C. Lesko, Jennifer Henderlong Corpus

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 43%
Social Sciences 18 20%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,094
of 2,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,085
of 154,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.